If a sport as young as snowboarding could have an “age old discussion” it would surely be: What are better Flow or traditional ratchet / strap bindings? You’ll see the discussion happening every couple days on snowboarding forums, much to the annoyance of the regulars. I hope that the info below will answer a few of your questions and help you to make the right decision.
Flow bindings
Flows are the original “rear entry” binding. They have one large strap section that is fixed over the top of the foot and a highback that drops down for access into the binding. They are considered the “marmite” of the snowboarding world, with most riders either loving or hating them.
Pros:
Fast easy access
Distribute pressure evenly across the top of the foot
No on-the-go adjustment; just lift the high-back and go
Cons:
Hard to get on when there’s a build up of snow or ice on the base plate
Very hard to get on in deep powder
Hard to make quick on-the-go adjustments
Can be heavier then ratchet bindings
Might not be as responsive as traditional bindings
Can’t rotate high-backs and have limited forward-lean adjustment
Ratchet bindings
I’m going to guess that 95% of bindings on the market are based loosely on the traditional ratchet model. They have 2 straps that fix your foot to the snowboard, one around the ankle and one over the toe. The “high-back”, where the back of your boot rests, is fixed. They clearly do the job, when you consider how many models use this formula.
Pros:
Are quickly adjustable
Often give better control, due to a well adjusted fit
Are generally light
There’s more choice
Easier to clear the base-plate of snow and ice
Cons:
Can be (marginally) slower to put on
Can put pressure on localised areas of the foot, ie toes (toe cups like Burton’s can help this though)
My opinion
I, personally, sit in the ratchet camp. The first pair of bindings I bought were Flows and I got them because I’d heard that they were easy and quick to use. When I moved to ratchet bindings after that, I decided I would never go back, they gave so much more control, were far easier to adjust and were actually easier to put on a lot of the time. So, I personally think that Flows solve a problem that isn’t there. I’m certainly not alone in feeling that way; when you look around at people who live or do seasons in the mountains, you’ll rarely see anyone wearing Flows.
I haven’t mentioned some of the other rear-entry bindings, like the K2 Clinch (that also have adjustable toe and heal straps). As combined bindings, they’ll have a lot of both the Flow and Ratchet pros, so are growing in popularity. But to be honest, for me, they still solve a problem that isn’t there and I’m not interested in the extra weight and complications.
Don’t just take my word for it though, check out some of the forum discussions, but maybe don’t bother starting new threads… there’s plenty of them already out there!
Nonstopsnowboard.com instructor and improver courses.
via nonstopski.com